tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9950471.post1499434808774894122..comments2007-04-13T16:50:02.671-05:00Comments on blog, by me: grow up, DCistemiliehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01489469540710198129noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9950471.post-38034030463843406142007-04-13T16:50:00.000-05:002007-04-13T16:50:00.000-05:00Well, first of all, I'm not sure that the Nats com...Well, first of all, I'm not sure that the Nats coming to D.C. can be accurately referred to as "depriving of the rights of citizenship" [definition of disenfranchisement] of Oriole fandom. I.e., just because they came to town, doesn't mean O's fans were not allowed to be O's fans anymore.<BR/>Therefore, any "switching" was a proactive measure by said O's fan, rather than a usurption of their fanship.<BR/><BR/>Secondly, I guess anyone silly enough to "switch" teams just because a new one came to town deserves a joke such as that new team not doing very well.<BR/><BR/>Your referral to Nats fandom as a "joke," however, is unwarranted...and I'm sure that if someone referred to your pre-World-Series BoSox as a joke, you wouldn't be laughing either.emiliehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01489469540710198129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9950471.post-74262983758848304832007-04-13T13:39:00.000-05:002007-04-13T13:39:00.000-05:00I imagine that most Nats fans are just disenfranch...I imagine that most Nats fans are just disenfranchised O's fans. Jokes on them, I guess.Montyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10744371108097691607noreply@blogger.com